Archive for the ‘Glasses’ Category

« Older Entries

Re: High Def Glasses & Wavefront Aberrometer

July 27th, 2010 by admin

<!– /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:”Cambria Math”; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1107304683 0 0 415 0;} @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-520092929 1073786111 9 0 415 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:”"; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:”Times New Roman”,”serif”; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; mso-default-props:yes; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:”Times New Roman”; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} .MsoPapDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; margin-bottom:10.0pt; line-height:115%;} @page Section1 {size:612.0pt 792.0pt; margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt; mso-header-margin:36.0pt; mso-footer-margin:36.0pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} –>

Dan wrote:
In the USA, some clinics offer “high definition” glasses. The material used for the glasses apparently provides better vision. The process however starts with an eye examination using a wavefront aberrometer that more accurately maps the irregularities of the eye.

In Canada, optical stores provide these glasses with regular prescriptions. Where in Canada can a person obtain a prescription using a wavefront aberrometer and is the improvement (if any) worth it?

ANSWER

Dan,

I am not aware of any clinic using one, but that does mean there are not any out there.  Frankly I have not heard that the instrumentation is available to a clinic.  If you are aware of the company who distributes the instrumentation, it may be easiest to contact that company and ask where to find one in Canada.

As to the effectiveness of such prescriptions and glasses made from them, in my opinion, the jury is still out.

Dr. Joan Hansen, Optometrist for CAO


Digg  |  Newsvine  |  Stumbleupon  |  del.icio.us

Re: Wrong PD for Glasses Bought Online

July 27th, 2010 by admin

<!– /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:”Cambria Math”; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1107304683 0 0 415 0;} @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-520092929 1073786111 9 0 415 0;} @font-face {font-family:Consolas; panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:modern; mso-font-pitch:fixed; mso-font-signature:-520092929 1073806591 9 0 415 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:”"; margin-top:0cm; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:10.0pt; margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:”Calibri”,”sans-serif”; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:”Times New Roman”; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} p.MsoPlainText, li.MsoPlainText, div.MsoPlainText {mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-link:”Plain Text Char”; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:10.5pt; font-family:Consolas; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:”Times New Roman”; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} span.PlainTextChar {mso-style-name:”Plain Text Char”; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-locked:yes; mso-style-link:”Plain Text”; mso-bidi-font-size:10.5pt; font-family:Consolas; mso-ascii-font-family:Consolas; mso-hansi-font-family:Consolas;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; mso-default-props:yes; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:”Times New Roman”; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} .MsoPapDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; margin-bottom:10.0pt; line-height:115%;} @page Section1 {size:612.0pt 792.0pt; margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt; mso-header-margin:36.0pt; mso-footer-margin:36.0pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} –>

Brian wrote:

I AM AGE 76 AND RECENTLY PURCHASED NEW PROGRESSIVE GLASSES ONLINE.

IT APPEARS THAT THEY TOOK MY PD READING AS 60 INSTEAD OF 64.

COULD YOU PLEASE DESCRIBE ANY DETRAMENTAL EFFECTS THIS COULD HAVE?

KIND REGARDS,

BRIAN

ANSWER

Dear Brian

You describe very well the main problem of internet purchase of glasses: the lack of professional advice before and after the purchase of the glasses and/or contact lenses. Optical devices are not soap bars and should be seen as medical devices that are to be prescribed and customized to the needs of a particular patient. It is important to take the measurements appropriately and to center the progressive lenses at the right place. If not, you won’t see well, you can fell dizziness and ocular fatigue. These glasses can trigger headaches and other asthenopic problems. You can complain and they may refund you. My best advice is to consult your optometrist to get his professional recommendations.

Optometrists and opticians are professionals that will help you to determine which type of progressive lens is the most suitable to address your specific needs (there are numerous designs of progressive lenses and they are not all equal), which material to use (plastic or polycarbonate), the essential coatings (anti-scratch, UV shield and anti-glare) and a frame that fits you optimally. A too large or too small frame is not appropriate especially if you have moderate to high myopia. Thickness of the glasses is directly related with the selection of the appropriate frame. Finally the professional will ensure that all measurements are done appropriately. Not only the PD but more important the height of the progression should be determined on a specific frame. Internet companies never ask for this measure and they center their lenses in the middle of the frame. They ask the consumer to align the lens with their pupil by juggling with the nose pads. This is silly considering that a frame should be fitted first and the glasses should be customized after. Discomfort from the wear of the frame, bad vision, or asthenopia are most of the time encountered when a frame and/or a pair of glasses are not well measured and designed.

Please, do not play with your eyes. They worth more than the couple of bucks you imagine to save through internet. For less than a Starbuck coffee a day your optometrist can make you happy with the optimal pair of progressive glasses that fits you the best consult your optometrist who knows better than anyone your eyes and can give you professional advices. More than that, he will be always there to answer any of your questions or concerns. This is of value, in itself.

Dr. Langis Michaud, OD, MSc, FAAO (Dipl)
Professeur Agrégé
Université de Montréal

Digg  |  Newsvine  |  Stumbleupon  |  del.icio.us

Re: Prescription Sunglasses are too Heavy

May 20th, 2010 by Dr Carol Doman

Farhad wrote:
I placed an order for a pair of prescription sunglasses. So I had my eyes examined and then selected the frame of my choice. On the day that I picked up this pair, I noticed that the lenses installed on the frame were somewhat very thick, thicker than what I always used to have.  My sunglasses are using lenses of very high quality and worth good amount of money. Once I started using my sunglasses, I realized that they start hurting my nose after 20 minutes of usage; they weight a lot and a continuous usage hurts my nose to a point that I need to remove them. Don’t you believe that the sales person should have advised me if I selected a suitable type of frame for this intention? Don’t you believe he should have had that knowledge that the selected frame may require a lot of lenses surface and thus would make the final product very uncomfortable once sitting on one’s nose? Please advise. Thank you.

ANSWER

Hi Farhad,
It is always true that after placing prescription lenses in a frame the weight will increase.  Depending on your prescription the amount of weight will vary.  Did you get high-index (thinner) lenses in your sunglasses? If not you may be able to upgrade to high-index lenses, which would help with the thickness and the weight of the lenses. There’s a good chance that you also might need to have the frame adjusted on your face.  Sometimes by tightening the frame behind your ears this will alleviate the pressure the frame is exerting on your nose.  My advice would be to return to where you purchased the sunglasses and see what they can do to since you are not happy with your new glasses.
Dr. Doman

Digg  |  Newsvine  |  Stumbleupon  |  del.icio.us

Re: Why is the Tint a Number or Percentage?

May 17th, 2010 by Dr. Virginia Donati

Trish wrote:
Good morning,

My question is with relation to tints. When billing for tints why is a tint number or percentage identified? Is this information writen on teh prescription? If not, how does the lab know what tint to add to teh lenses?

Thanks,
Trish

ANSWER

Hello Trish,
The number used to classify tints identifies how dark the tint is.  If a tint is 70-80%, it is a full sunglass-type tint.  If a tint is 10-30%, it is more of a light, cosmetic tint.  If, for example, your prescription reads 70% Brown, it is saying that you want a pair of brown sunglasses.  This number will be written on the prescription in most cases.  Thank you for your question.
Dr. Donati

Digg  |  Newsvine  |  Stumbleupon  |  del.icio.us

Re: Are Progressives Necessary for Computer Work

April 7th, 2010 by Dr. Sally Aldayeh

Teren wrote:
I am 23 and have been wearing progressive lenses since I was 15. I have multiply eye conditions including a prism and require glasses however I am tired of always having to wear larger glasses to accomidate for the progressive lens as most glasss are not made for younger people needing a prism. At work I use a computer but from a distance and do not use my progressive anyway, what could be the side effects on my eyes if i decide to drop the progressive lens?

ANSWER

Hi Teren,
Progressive lenses are usually prescribed for younger patients to aid with their focus deficiency at near, also you have prisms in your glasses to avoid seeing double.  If you drop the progressive lenses, and depending on how strong your near prescription is, you might notice some difficulty focusing at near.  You can ask your optometrist to trial your reading with just your distance prescription and then go from there.  But for sure worth looking into.

Dr. Sally Aldayeh, OD

Digg  |  Newsvine  |  Stumbleupon  |  del.icio.us

Re: Are Computer Glasses Really Needed

April 7th, 2010 by Dr. Sally Aldayeh

Jennifer wrote:
I do not currently wear eye glasses nor have I ever worn them (I’m 39). Recently I went to a local optometrist for an eye test, basically to check for glaucoma because it runs in my family. I was told I didn’t have glaucoma. In fact, the optometrist told me there is nothing currently wrong with my vision. While I was there, however, he wrote me a prescription for computer glasses because I mentioned I work in front of a computer for up to 8 hours a day.  His reason for the prescription is that my eyes will eventually deteriorate and wearing glasses while looking at a computer will help to slow down this deterioration. I put a deposit of $50 on the glasses which they call PL Readers. The total cost is $266. I do not have any insurance plan that covers this.

Now that I’m at home, I’m wondering if I’ve made a mistake in ordering these. The deposit is nonrefundable so I’m going to lose it if I don’t purchase them. However, I don’t understand the concept of wearing glasses to prevent deterioration that hasn’t happened yet. I have heard of computer vision syndrome but I honestly haven’t noticed any symptoms of it eg. dry eyes, headaches, etc. I feel like this was just a way to get me to buy expensive glasses. Can you tell me if it makes sense to wear computer glasses now to prevent deterioration later?

ANSWER

Hi Jennifer,
Presbyopia is an age related condition.  Similar to grey hair and wrinkles, presbyopia is caused by the natural course of ageing.  The consequence of presbyopia is a progressive diminish of our near focus (Books and computers) with age.  Usually starts between ages of 40-50.  You can’t escape presbyopia, even if you’ve never had a vision problem before nor, can you slow its progression by wearing computer glasses early.

Symptoms of presbyopia would be holding books, magazines, newspapers, menus and other reading materials at arm’s length in order to focus properly, and/or when performing near work, such as embroidery or handwriting, you may develop headaches, eye strain or feel fatigued.  This is usually the time to start wearing near or computer glasses in order to perform at near longer without symptoms.

Dr. Sally Aldayeh, OD

Digg  |  Newsvine  |  Stumbleupon  |  del.icio.us

Re: Requirement for a Prism

April 6th, 2010 by Dr Joan Hansen

Robert wrote:
After 20+ years of having a prism as part of my prescription… my current prescription as of last week has no requirement for a prescription.
The fellow at Sears optical was quite surprised and called the optometrist who said I’d be fine… I’m concerned about the sudden change… does this sound reasonable?

Thanks
Rob

ANSWER

Rob,
Prescriptions that include prism can sometimes change so that the prism is no longer required. This does not happen very often, in my experience. I would suggest that you have your Optometrist re-check your eyes to specifically measure the prism component, and explain the results to you.

Dr. Joan Hansen, Optometrist for CAO

Digg  |  Newsvine  |  Stumbleupon  |  del.icio.us

Re: Glasses Hurt Eyes

March 23rd, 2010 by Dr. Virginia Donati

Karen wrote:
Dear Doctor,  I’m a 53-year- old woman who has been wearing glasses for the past 13 years. My first prescription was for readers, and my present prescription is for progressive bifocals. I see the same optometrist for all my vision needs.  I have also been on topiramate for approx. 5 years, which I understand can affect vision. I’ve never had a glaucoma test.

My problem is this: With the last two vision prescriptions (covering the past 6 years), my glasses hurt my eyes and I can’t see properly, even after allowing for a generous adjustment period (i.e., one month).

I have no problem adjusting to a progressive lens itself–not even in terms of the outer edges of the lens.

Does it sound like my glasses are too strong? Why do my glasses bother me so much, for so long?

I do plan to discuss this with my optometrist.
Thanks for your time.

ANSWER

Hello Karen,
I think it is a great idea to discuss this with the prescribing optometrist.  It is possible that the glasses are too strong, but it is also possible that they are too weak, not adjusted properly, or that there is another yet undiagnosed problem that you are suffering from.  I am certain that your optometrist will be able to weed out the culprit since he/she will have all your exam findings.
Best of luck,
Dr. Donati

Digg  |  Newsvine  |  Stumbleupon  |  del.icio.us

Re: Distortion and Barrel Effect

March 3rd, 2010 by Dr Henry Smit

Breen wrote:
I am a myopic mid-50s adult with extremely good peripheral vision.  As a result, I am very sensitive to distortion of any form (the barrel effect), and am aware at all times of the edges of my glasses, even though they are attached to the bridge and temples only. I also have a second pair of single vision glasses with a field of focus optimized for computer use. Progressive lenses are out of the question.

My previous single vision glasses were Nikon high refractive index lenses (Nikon 5, with RI 1.74), and I was very happy with the level of distortion, which while always present, was tolerable.

My new prescription (OD/OS -3.25 spherical only, 0 cyl.) resulted in an opportunity for me to try out the Nikon SeeMax lenses, which promise minimal distortion.  However, the result is exactly opposite from what I expected, and exhibit far more curvature distortion than my old lenses.  My previous prescription was OS/OD -2.25 spherical, which is a significant difference.  However, when I look at the details on the new glasses receipt, I see they used the 1.6, and not the higher 1.74 (or even 1.67) refractive index lenses. This was a surprise to me, as I assumed that they would order the same RI as the old ones, and I will be getting them to replace them with the thinner 1.74 lenses to minimize the visibility of the edges of the lenses (due to extremely good peripheral vision).

Could I expect less curvature distortion with the higher refractive index of 1.74, vs. the 1.6 that I’m unhappy with?

What if anything, does the base curve have to do with distortion, and how is this related to the refractive index for the lenses in question?

Also, are there other lenses which might be more suitable for me than the Nikon SeeMax to minimize peripheral distortion?

ANSWER

Dear Breen
From your letter it appears that you are a very “sensitive observer” – someone who notices distortions that the average person would not detect. The barrel effect that you mention tends to be more noticeable with an increase in the size of the lens that you are looking through. If there is more peripheral lens to look through, you will be exposed to more peripheral distortion. Although you did not mention lens size in your letter, if your new lenses are larger than your old pair, it may be a factor in the distortion you are experiencing.
Typically, as the index of the lens increases, there is an increase in the amount of radial astigmatism (another form of distortion) in the lenses. However, the customized lens surfacing techniques such as those used with the Nikon SeeMax have typically made great improvements in reducing the level of the other lens distortions (such as barrel distortion) experienced by the wearer. However, a -3.25 lens will induce more barrel astigmatism than an equivalent sized -2.25 lens made of the same material. A 1.74 index lens at -2.25D would be flatter and thinner than a 1.6 index lens at -3.25D and this difference, in your case, may also be contributing to the distortion you are noticing.
The Nikon SeeMax is a well designed lens with a good track record. There are other lens options from different manufacturers that also perform well. Unfortunately, there is very little reliable independent data available that compares lens performance from different manufacturers. Most of the information available is self-generated by the lens manufacturers, and to no one’s surprise, each manufacturer appears to claim that their own lens performs best. Hard data aside, the other factor that the lens manufacturers cannot control is the visual perception of the patient wearing the lenses. It has been my experience that patients with same the very similar lens prescription, visual demands and frame size still express different preferences in their lens design choices. Based on your apparent sensitivity to distortion, it may be advisable to stick with a frame and lens design that you have successfully worn in the past.
Boring, but it sometimes does the trick when all else fails!
Dr. Smit

Digg  |  Newsvine  |  Stumbleupon  |  del.icio.us

Re: Serious Distortion with New Lenses

March 3rd, 2010 by Dr Henry Smit

Mike wrote:
Hi,

I recently had my prescription updated and went to get a new pair of glasses but ran into some visual distortion issues.

My normal optometrist (that I have been seeing since I was 10, I am 27 now) was not available at the time, so I made use of the in-house one where I was getting my glasses.

The prescription [I don't have it] (which was later checked by my normal optometrist) was accurate, save for the prism. For whatever reason, She could not see it while taking the measurements. So she added the prism from my glasses that I was wearing at the time (a 1 B0 prism).

The optician did the glasses. When I tried them I noticed a significant distortion of the ground immediately in front of me, it was like I was walking up a 3′ hill all the time. This was looking ahead normally while walking. It was also like they were magnifying the image as well, as if I looked straight down, my body/legs appeared to be about 2′ tall (I’m 6′). I made a point of wearing them for a few days to see if it was an adaptation issue but there was not noticeable improvement.

At that point I went back to the opticians and they rechecked everything PD, prescription, as well as positioning of the frames on my face to no avail. They suggested that I go to my normal optometrist to double check the prescription. Which I did and ended up with:

OD -800 -075 175 1.5 B0
OS -650 -050 008 1.5 B0

I took this back to the opticians and they re-did the lenses with the new prism. These were a no go as well. Same visual distortion. Again, they checked the lenses, position etc. All seemed ok. Though they noted that the base curve of the new lenses was not the same as my old ones. So they suggested that they re-grind the lenses with the old base curve to see if that would fix the situation.

While it did improve the distortion it was no longer a 3′ hill immediately in front of me, there was still a significant rise in the ground probably from 6 to 10′ away, I would have to guess that it looked like it was about 1′-2′ rise, though it was smooth not abrupt, kinda like a pronounced crown in the road.

At that point I had given up on the glasses as the opticians could not provide any answers or other things to try, other then to check the prescription with my optometrist again. Which I did and ended up with the most recent prescription of:

OD -775 -075 175 1.5 B0
OS -675 -050 006 1.5 B0

I have not had this made into a set of glasses yet, as I don’t know what was causing the problem and I am a little leery of going through this again considering the cost of the lenses alone usually runs about $300+.

The lenses they were using above were Zeiss 1.67 RI, their lab was using Essilor Kappa. The frame size was 49-19, Oakley Rotor S.

My old glasses (which I am still wearing) were from Lensecrafters, the lenses are Featherweights (polycarb 1.54 RI?). Frame size 46-18, similar lens shape to the Oakleys, rounded rectangle. Old glasses prescription is:

OD -750 -050 180 1.0 B0
OS -625 -050 180 1.0 B0

Any ideas what was happening?

Thanks for your time.

ANSWER

Mike
Dear Mike
I will do my best to offer some suggestions based on the information that you have given me. For starters, yours is a fairly high prescription, and high prescriptions create more distortions than lenses made in a lower prescription. Secondly, I suspect that you are a sensitive observer and that you may be bothered by induced distortions that might otherwise go unnoticed by the average observer.
It appears that your new prescription is a little bit stronger, that you are wearing a slightly larger frame, that the amount of “base in” prism has increased slightly and that the axis of the astigmatism has changed slightly (going from exactly horizontal to being tipped up slightly at the outside of the frame). Each of these changes, by themselves, would probably not cause a great change in visual perception. However, these four small changes, in combination, may be enough for a sensitive observer to notice. In addition, it is possible that the “wrap” of the new frame is different that the vertical centration of the lenses may be different from what you are used to wearing. These factors could make your adaption to the new glasses a little more difficult.
Fortunately, most patients do eventually adapt to changes in prescription and lens design. If you have worn the glasses for a period of a few weeks and do not experience any improvement in your symptoms, you may want to try to go back to a smaller frame. As a last resort, you may also want to go back to the polycarbonate lenses, but any improvement in spatial perception you might gain may also be offset by the generally lower optical quality that polycarbonate lenses provide away from their optical centers.
I wish you luck. It sounds that you and your different care providers are doing their best to make things work for you. Hopefully with a little more perseverance you will be successful.
Best of luck
Dr. Smit

Digg  |  Newsvine  |  Stumbleupon  |  del.icio.us